the
concept of individual cell identification in vitro and in vivo, using specific
DNA-antibody complexes. The cell surface membrane, a
lipid bilayer with numerous specific proteins embedded on, in, and through it,
has been extremely useful for the identification, quantification, and
collection of specific cell types for both patient care and research. Determining
in real time and in situ with viable cells the exact
identification of the cells and having this information immediately reported
using bioinformatics, would be
very advantageous. The work of Rudchenko, Stojanovic and colleagues at Columbia
University provides a beginning for such a system, using whole blood (Rudchenko
M, et al., Nature Nanotechnology,
1023;8:580-586).
DNA-specific antibody complexes attach to the cell surface. Through a
cascading process of movement on the fluid cell surface, these interacting
complexes determine whether a cell is or is not the specific cell type being
sought. Not only can this technique can
be applied to identifying the cellular population of choice for collection and
further testing, such as a cancer or organ stem cell, but alsothe process can
be scaled, so that the identification of "unknown" cell types may be
collected. Background information and the method are reviewed by Schaus T E and
Yin P: Molecular Computing: In SituComputation
of Cell Identity, Nature Nanotechnology,
2013;8:546-548. See Figure 1 below.
Figure 1 (Schaus & Yin): A three-input AND gate (A AND B AND C)
using a programmed cascade of reactions on a cell surface. Three probe molecules (to antigens A, B and C), each of which are
composed of an antibody (grey) conjugated to one strand of a synthetic DNA
duplex (shown as a series of colored domains), are added to a solution and bind
to their target antigens on the surface of a cell (brown). An initiator
molecule (Ini) is then added (left panel), which binds to the complementary
strand of probe A by means of the toehold sequence (purple), and removes it,
exposing a new signal sequence (red). The newly active probe A then interacts
with probe B in a similar fashion, and probe B subsequently activates probe C (middle
panels). The exposed strand of activated probe C represents the unique output
signal of the cascade, which is possible only when antigens A, B and C are all
present. In the example shown, probe C binds, separates and de-quenches a
fluorophore strand from a soluble reporter duplex (R), leaving the cascade in
its fluorescent (yellow star), completed state (right panel).
The details of a specific example from human whole blood are in Figure 1
below: the automated and computed identification of T-lymphocytes with the
phenotypes of CD45+/CD20+ and CD45+/CD20-.
Figure 1 (Rudchenko, et al.): Design considerations for automata operating on cell surfaces. a, Scheme of automata operating on a B cell with a C45+CD20+ phenotype (target) and on an example of a non-targeted cell with a CD45+CD20- phenotype (for example, a T cell). Oligonucleotide components (colored horizontal lines) attached to antibodies (Y-shaped structures) are brought together on some cells and not others (for example, αCD45-1·2 and αCD20-3·4 are together only on B cells), leading to a cascade of oligonucleotide transfers driven by an increase in complementarity. The transfers result in a unique single-stranded oligonucleotide 4 being displayed only on targeted cells. b, Scheme of a typical strand displacement reaction used in the automata 0 + 1·2 + 3·4 0·1 + 2·3 + 4, controlled by a sequential exposure of toeholds (T1 then T3): single-stranded oligonucleotide 0 displaces oligonucleotide 2 from its complex with 1 via toehold interactions, that is, stronger complementarity and kinetic enablement due to the additional complementarity with exposed T1. This generates an oligonucleotide stretch in strand 2 complementary to a toehold T3 in strand 3 that can extend the reaction cascade by displacing oligonucleotide 4 from 3·4. This in turn generates the next oligonucleotide stretch complementary to toehold T5, which can be used to extend the cascade to 5·6 (not shown), and so on (as indicated by double dotted arrows), or to label the cell with 5 carrying fluorescein. Without other components displaying T5, the cascade stops at 4. c, An example of oligonucleotide sequences used in the automata.
Figure 1 (Rudchenko, et al.): Design considerations for automata operating on cell surfaces. a, Scheme of automata operating on a B cell with a C45+CD20+ phenotype (target) and on an example of a non-targeted cell with a CD45+CD20- phenotype (for example, a T cell). Oligonucleotide components (colored horizontal lines) attached to antibodies (Y-shaped structures) are brought together on some cells and not others (for example, αCD45-1·2 and αCD20-3·4 are together only on B cells), leading to a cascade of oligonucleotide transfers driven by an increase in complementarity. The transfers result in a unique single-stranded oligonucleotide 4 being displayed only on targeted cells. b, Scheme of a typical strand displacement reaction used in the automata 0 + 1·2 + 3·4 0·1 + 2·3 + 4, controlled by a sequential exposure of toeholds (T1 then T3): single-stranded oligonucleotide 0 displaces oligonucleotide 2 from its complex with 1 via toehold interactions, that is, stronger complementarity and kinetic enablement due to the additional complementarity with exposed T1. This generates an oligonucleotide stretch in strand 2 complementary to a toehold T3 in strand 3 that can extend the reaction cascade by displacing oligonucleotide 4 from 3·4. This in turn generates the next oligonucleotide stretch complementary to toehold T5, which can be used to extend the cascade to 5·6 (not shown), and so on (as indicated by double dotted arrows), or to label the cell with 5 carrying fluorescein. Without other components displaying T5, the cascade stops at 4. c, An example of oligonucleotide sequences used in the automata.
One limitation of this cascading process is that it is limited by the
least abundant probe present on the cell surface. A process using a probe that propagates its signal to multiple
downstream partners would overcome this limitation. This propagation would lead
to faster and higher signal generation, as well as creating a binary output
typical of logic circuits.
The number of novel nanotechnology processes that can be utilized in
both medical and non-medical settings is starting to move up the exponential
curve. I sincerely hope that the promise and delivery of improved patient care
and safety through the use of simple and complex medical nanobots will outweigh
the potential safety risks involved in their development and use.
http://boards.medscape.com/forums?128@748.LQ2caWU4bb4@.2a594116!comment=1&cat=All
No comments:
Post a Comment