The idea of using nanorobots to deliver drugs and fight diseases such as
cancers is not new (check this story for
example). But there are still lots of issues to solve before nanorobots can
diagnose our diseases and treat them. Now, an international team of researchers
has designed a software and hardware platform of a nanorobot to be used in medical
applications. The researchers think their nanorobots could become
available around 2015. But read more...
You can see above the "nanorobots' design-sensors, molecular
sorting rotors, fins and propellers. The depicted blue cones shows the sensors
'touching' areas." In fact, these nanorobots can move with
six-degrees-of-freedom, i.e., arbitrary translation and rotation fins and
propellers. They also have specific sensory capabilities to detect the target
regions, obstacles and chemicals relevant for their medical application."
(Credit: Adriano Cavalcanti and colleagues)
This other image describes how nanorobots deliver drugs -- at least in a
virtual environment. "The 3D environment contains nanorobots, obstacles,
biomolecules and specific medical targets. The medical targets represent
organ-inlets, displaced stochastically as target locations or drug delivery
points for medical applications." (Credit: Adriano Cavalcanti and
colleagues)
The images above have been created by Adriano
Cavalcanti, the CEO and chairman of the Center for Automation in Nanobiotech (CAN),
who also is researcher at Monash University in Melbourne. But he was not alone.
He was helped by Bijan
Shirinzadeh, an associate professor in the Robotics and Mechatronics
Research Laboratory at Monash University in Melbourne, Robert Freitas, Jr., of the Institute for Molecular Manufacturing in
California, and Tad Hogg who
works for Hewlett-Packard Laboratories also in California.
Now, let's look at the Cavalcanti's interview by nanotechweb.org. Here is a
question I would have asked. "Q: How can nanorobots be achieved? A: In the
same way microelectronics has provided new medical devices in the 80s, now the
miniaturization through nanotechnology is enabling the manufacturing of
nanobiosensors and actuators to improve cell biology interfaces and
biomolecular manipulation. Fully operational nanorobots for biomedical
instrumentation should be achieved as a result of nanobioelectronics and
proteomics integration."
And how simulation work help? "The methodologies and the
implemented 3D simulation described in our study served as a test bed for
molecular machine prototyping. The numerical analysis and advanced simulations
provided a better understanding on how nanorobots should interact inside the
human body. Hence, based on such information, we have proposed the innovative
hardware architecture with a nanorobot model for use in common medical
applications. The nanorobot takes chemical and thermal gradient changes as
interaction choices for in vivo treatments. The use of mobile
phones with RF is adopted in this platform as the most effective approach for
control upload, helping to interface nanorobots communication and energy
supply."
In Virtual 3D nanorobots
could lead to real cancer-fighting technology, PhysOrg.com gives
more details about the 3D virtual nanorobots. "In a demonstration of the
real-time simulation, the nanorobots had the task of searching for proteins in
a dynamic virtual environment, and identifying and bringing those proteins to a
specific “organ-inlet” for drug delivery. The researchers analyzed how the
nanorobots used different strategies to achieve this goal. For instance, the
nanorobots could employ different sensory capabilities such as chemical and
temperature sensors, as well as random movement. For the nanorobots, one of the
most difficult parts was maneuvering close enough to a biomolecule to be able
to sense that biomolecule, while accounting for many different forces and moving
bodies. Unlike on the macroscale, viscosity dominates movement in arteries,
affecting the nanorobots’ traveling as it encounters obstacles and proteins
moving passively through the fluid."
PhysOrg.com also asked Cavalcanti when these
nanorobots could become available to help us. "'If you consider the
velocity that miniaturization is moving, from micro to nanoelectronics, then
you can easily understand the feasibility to have medical nanorobots integrated
as a nanoelectronic molecular machine before 2015,' he predicted, adding that
nanorobots, like all medical technologies, would still need to undergo safety
testing, which would push back the date for mass production and
commercialization."
This research work has been published in the January 9, 2008 issue of Nanotechnology under
the name "Nanorobot architecture for medical target identification"
(Volume 19, Number 1, Article 015103). Here is an excerpt from the abstract.
"The nanorobots operate in a virtual environment comparing random, thermal
and chemical control techniques. The nanorobot architecture model has
nanobioelectronics as the basis for manufacturing integrated system devices
with embedded nanobiosensors and actuators, which facilitates its application
for medical target identification and drug delivery. The nanorobot interaction
with the described workspace shows how time actuation is improved based on
sensor capabilities. Therefore, our work addresses the control and the architecture
design for developing practical molecular machines. Advances in nanotechnology
are enabling manufacturing nanosensors and actuators through nanobioelectronics
and biologically inspired devices."
From the link above, you can access to the full paper (PDF
format, 15 pages, 1.51 MB), from which the above pictures have been picked. The
access is free to the Institute of
Physics registered users.
[Disclaimer: Adriano Cavalcanti thought I would be interested by these
progresses about nanorobots. Of course, I was. Now it remains to be seen if
some of my readers also would be interested. Anyway, I have no financial ties
with Adriano Cavalcanti and his company. For more information -- and pictures
-- about his research, please check his Nanorobotics Control Designsite.]
Finally, please drop me a note if you think these future nanorobots can
benefit to us or not.
Sources: nanotechweb.org, December 4, 2007; Lisa Zyga,
PhysOrg.com, December 5, 2007; and various websites
No comments:
Post a Comment